This course will cover comprehension syllabus of MP CJ&nbsp;by Tansukh Paliwal Sir and other Linking Faculties.
UNIQUE FEATURES
<ul>
	<li>Major Classes By Tansukh Sir&nbsp;</li>
	<li>Diagrammatic Notes</li>
	<li>Comprehension Course</li>
	<li>Section Postmortem</li>
	<li>Test &amp; Practice Session</li>
	<li>Key words smart technique</li>
	<li>Linking Style of Teaching</li>
	<li>Hinglish Classes</li>
	<li>E Access of all Study Material&nbsp;</li>
	<li>Mock Tests</li>
	<li>25 Court Case Proceeding Documents</li>
</ul>
 
📞 Course Helpline : 988&nbsp;774 6465
Disclaimer:&nbsp;Once the course is purchased, the fee is non-refundable under any circumstances. Please ensure that you review all course details carefully before making the payment.

Uttarakhand Judiciary (MPCJ) Regular Recorded Course

Linking Laws

MP Judiciary Guidance Brochure

RJS Mains Book with UP - Final - Criminal Laws - Judgment & Drafting

12. Preamble (long title) - l/w Repeal and Savings-S.531

The Preamble (long title) declares the Republic’s ideals, while Section 531 of BNSS 2023 ensures smooth transition by repealing CrPC but saving its lawful actions, maintaining continuity of justice.

Recorded Lectures

Linking Publication

Court Case Proceeding Document

51. Case Study -  (shadi.com) IT Law and Evidence - Anupam Mittal v. State

Anupam Mittal v. State – Shaadi.com fraud case: Woman defrauded ₹11 lakh via fake profile; FIR against Mittal & others. Issue: intermediary liability under IT Act S.79. SC stayed proceedings, gave 8‑w

50. BSA Linking with BNSS

“BSA decides what is admissible (facts, documents, judgments, oral evidence), BNSS decides how it is applied in procedure (investigation, trial, appeal).”

49. BSA Link with CPC 1908

“BSA decides admissibility of facts, documents, judgments, and oral evidence; CPC decides the civil procedure for presenting, proving, and relying on them.”

48. Case Study - Landmark Judgment Handwriting Expert

“Murari Lal v. State of MP (1979): SC held handwriting expert opinion can be relied upon without mandatory corroboration; expert is not an accomplice; conviction upheld based on expert evidence + reco

47. Case Study - Interested Witness : Evidentiary Value Landmark Judgment

“Rahul v. State of Haryana (2019): SC held that testimony of interested witnesses is admissible but must be carefully scrutinized; handwriting expert opinion is relevant but not conclusive; conviction

46. Case Study - Circumstantial Evidence vide Landmark Judgment

“Sharad Birdhichand Sarda v. Maharashtra (1984): SC laid down five golden principles for conviction on circumstantial evidence; acquittal granted as chain of circumstances was incomplete.”

45. C - 5 Documentary Evidence  (Part 10) - Certification S. 63(4)(c)

“Under S.63(4)(c), electronic record admissibility requires a certificate signed by the person in charge and an expert, stating facts to the best of their knowledge and belief, as per the Schedule.”

44. C - 5 Documentary Evidence  (Part 9) - Judgments of Courts when relevant - E-Record Admissibility as Document  S. 61 - 63

“Electronic/digital records (S.61) recognized as documents; special provisions ensure authenticity (S.62); admissibility depends on compliance with prescribed conditions (S.63).”

43. C - 8 Estoppel - Estoppel judicary Noticeable Facts Oral Evidence S. 121 - 123 , 51 , 52 , 55

“Estoppel prevents denial of prior representation (Ss.121–123); judicially noticeable facts need no proof (Ss.51–52); oral evidence must be direct (S.55).”

42. Relevancy of Facts (Part 10) -  Character when relevant  S. 43 - 50

“Opinions on usages, relationship, and grounds (Ss.43–45) are relevant. In civil cases character is irrelevant (S.46); in criminal cases good character is relevant (S.47), sexual history excluded

Description

Content

MP Judiciary Guidance Brochure

Recorded Lectures

Linking Publication

Court Case Proceeding Document

Madhya Pradesh Judiciary (MPCJ) Regular Recorded Course